Method: Socratic dialogue. 
Requirements: Preview: mandatory reading of the academic text that discusses the possibility of exercising its power of administrative police by state enterprises. In the classroom: internet research of legislation, doctrine and official electronic sites of the organizations.
- Mandatory reading: “Estatais com poder de polícia: por que não?”. Author: José Vicente Santos de Mendonça. Em Revisa de Direito Administrativo, vol 252, (009), available at: virtual library of the Fundação Getúlio Vargas, link: http://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0C... .
- Entities list used in the exercise with the website link
Introduction to the dynamics: It was given to each student the name of an autarchy or a state company (federal, state or municipal).

DEVELOPMENT OF THE DYNAMICS: 
Part 1 - Concepts and dogmatic categories.

1. The dynamics began with the split of the blackboard into two categories: autarchy and state enterprise. It was encouraged that students pointed elements to establish differences between them. The information was included on the blackboard by the professor.              
2. The students were asked what were the various activities developed by the Government, that were seen in previous classes: exercise of authority, police power, regulatory power, granting power, industrial and commercial activities, contracting, personnel management, etc. The information was also included on the blackboard.
3. It was discussed the possibility of differentiation of these entities subject to the legal regime of public law from the classification of its activities in exclusive state activities (typical of authority) and common activities.                                      
4. It was discussed the arguments for and against the police power exercised by state-owned enterprises (those arguments contained in the obligatory previous text reading).            
Part 2 - Entities and their characteristics: what is the category?                                           
After the construction of the conceptual mark, the students were asked to participate by presenting the entity assigned to them at the beginning of class and providing a place for it within the categories of the board (autarchy or state enterprise, exclusive activity of state or common activity). The information for them to justify this choice was obtained via an internet search during the class (favoring the use of technology in the classroom for academic purposes). This activity was facilitated by the professor, who along the class, made comments about the fundamentals brought to the class.
End of the dynamics: the professor made a final reflection demonstrating that in many cases, the same activity can be performed by different entities from the indirect administration, and for other activities, only the structure of state-owned company or local autarchy is legally feasible. The professor recalled the existence of differences in the legal systems of these entities and these activities.                
Attention in the classroom: It was necessary the preparation of the student facing the key role that he would exercise in dynamics. If there is not the possibility of using the internet at the time of the class, the entities should be distributed in advance so that he can perform the search.